Weblog
Monday, 17 September 2007
-

Currently Watching
Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip - The Complete Series
By Steven Weber, Matthew Perry, Amanda Peet, Bradley Whitford, Sarah Paulson
see relatedMusings from Work
First thing this morning at the hospital was fire extinguisher training. I knew it was going to be interesting when the "teacher" gave us a paper with a quiz on it and only after we'd all completed it did he teach the class and give us the answers. This guy must have slept through high school, 'cause he definitely got it backwards. Anyway, after the reverse quiz, he took us all outside to play with fire...extinguishers--to play with fire extinguishers. I thought after the reverse quiz, we'd put out a fire backwards too, but he started the fire (with kerosene instead of gasoline--fewer carbon offsets, I think) and we had to put it out. Yeah, every morning should start like this. Mike and I had fun with it, although I don't think pinko-hippie fire dude was so amused.
After that, I went out to the new hospital to start installing monitors. Well, I got about halfway through hanging the mounting brackets when the floor people decided to start waxing the tiles in front of the only freight elevator in the building. No problem if you're on foot, but I had a pallet jack full of mounts and now I'm stuck on the second floor. Yeah--hope nobody thieves those empty boxes or the pallet jack tonight.
Way to Collate!
So while I was standing around waiting for Smokey the Beatnik, a guy came through the loading dock and I happened to glance at the title on his name badge: Job Coach. I don't even know what to think about this. I mean, is he the guy that stands behind you at the copy machine yelling things like, "You gotta attack that staple! It's not going to pull itself out! You gotta reach in there and grab it! Take it by the horns and rip it right outta there!" Is he auditioning for a bigger coaching job, like maybe if he gets promoted he's the Junior Assistant Women's Ping Pong Coach at the State's Medium Security Prison?
Ending Islamic Terrorism
I had a brilliant idea the other day--and this will actually, I believe, work. (Not that any of my other ideas won't work, but this one's golden). In order to put a complete stop to Islamic terrorism, we need to first of all understand why they want to blow themselves up. I'm going to have to go with the virgins, because in every poll of twenty- and thirty-something single men, not one of them will die for geopolitical reasons or because some cave-dweller with half a Reuben in his beard tells him to. Nope--sorry, not buying it.
Now, all we need to do is convince these guys that the seventy-two virgins they will receive in Islamo-paradise will (1) be wearing burqas, and (2) underneath said burqas look like Hillary Clinton. "See here, Ahmed, these women are virgins for a reason. Tell you what, I'll introduce you to Paris Hilton. So you won't blow up anymore buildings? Good." Works like a charm.
Sunday, 09 September 2007
-

Currently Watching
Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip - The Complete Series
By Steven Weber, Matthew Perry, Amanda Peet, Bradley Whitford, Sarah Paulson
see relatedAll kinds of brilliant things running around my head, and nowhere to put them. Who benefits? You!
Election 2008
It's about stinkin' time. Fred Thompson finally jumped into the race this week. Personally, I think he could have stayed "out" for a little while longer and not lost any credibility whatsoever. Uh huh... Regardless of his toying with the American people, I've come out in support of Fred Thompson right here on this very blog. There are candidates (Ron Paul, Mike Huckabee, Tom Tancredo, and Duncan Hunter) who I'm sure would also do very well as President of the United States. I could even be convinced to vote for one of those other guys. The problem is that they have absolutely no chance whatsoever of beating the Democrat nominee--unless by some act of God it turns out to be Dennis Kucinich.
As far as I'm concerned, Fred Thompson talks sense, shuns the "election hype," and is in favor of raising the dialogue of the campaign trail from forty-second soundbytes to an actual discussion ala Lincoln-Douglas on the issues of the day. The fact that he's like eight feet tall and could probably make Hillary hide behind her lectern in the debates is just an added bonus. The foreign policy of, "I'm from Tennessee, I drive a big red truck which may or may not have a gun rack" isn't a bad thing either.
President Pelosi?
I've come up with a way to ensure a Republican victory in 2008. This is going to sound crazy, but hang in there. The Republicans in the House need to draft articles of impeachment against both President Bush and Vice President Cheney--immediately. Their domestic policies regarding immigration reform are, in my opinion, tantamount to high treason or at the very least bringing aid and comfort to the enemy. The Republicans in the Senate must then also vote to remove both the president and vice president from office. I'm pretty sure we can count on Democrat support for this, but there's an added bonus:
Speaker Pelosi, whose approval ratings are even lower than the Bush White House and whose political views are slightly to the left of Karl Marx, would become President of the United States. After a couple weeks of political correctness run amok about her being the first woman president (haha, Hillary), she'll eventually have to do something with the few months she has left in office. That's just enough time for her to screw up badly enough that the American people demand competence, but not so long that her conservative replacement (Presdient Thompson, anyone?) can't clean up the mess relatively quickly.
Immigration Policy
I was watching "A Few Good Men" the other day. One of my favorite scenes in the movie (love Aaron Sorkin--love him) is when Colonel Jessep (Jack Nicholson) is on the witness stand and he gives his "You can't handle the truth!" speech. Just after he delivers that line, he says this:
"Son, we live in a world that has walls. And those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago and you curse the Marines. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: That Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives... You don't want the truth. Because deep down, in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me on that wall. You need me on that wall."
That should be the national immigration policy of the United States.
Captain Fantastic: Bringing you crackpot political theories since 2004.
Saturday, 21 July 2007
-
Two Down, One to Go
A little more sedate week here at the VCU-MCV startup. The only real excitement was from the guy I worked with. He's from the Virgin Islands and had to fly to Richmond. Since we worked together, I was the driver for the week. He was a nice enough guy, but as we were the only two single guys here this week, his insistance that we hit the clubs in an attempt to "score" was a bit taxing. (He did finally stop asking--though he was somewhat confused--when I told him that "scoring" wasn't an option because I wasn't very good at sports).
It's getting to the point in the startup that we've been to every area in the hospital and we're just going back over to pick up the rest of the pieces. This next week is going to be tough as we still have to find another five or six thousand pieces piecemeal rather than wholesale.
I'm sorry to say that my experiment with eHarmony has been a terrible failure. In the week since I made my attempt to be rejected by the site, they've managed to find me over fifty potential matches. I don't get those kind of results when I look for a used car. Maybe Neil Clark Warren should do an eHarmony project for used car buyers.
Sunday, 15 July 2007
-

Currently Listening
The Essential Billy Joel
see relatedLast week, I spent most of my time working at VCU-MCV with a 9.11 conspiracy theorist and a Bush-basher. As I was thinking about this over the weekend, I realized that people who buck the conventional wisdom and offer alternate theories most always sound more intelligent than those of us who accept the way things are presented to us. (Now, I'm not one to blindly accept what the media feeds me, but neither do I go looking for the most ridiculous possible explanation for something; neither will I swallow obvious, misinformed, and misguided supporting evidence for a theory--steel doesn't melt, Rosie O'Donnell?).
I do love being able to point out obvious fallacies in others' arguments, though (last week, though, it was very obvious that the best course of action was to keep my mouth shut--I just didn't want to waste my breath). When someone says that 9.11 was a conspiracy by the Bush administration to get us to invade Iraq and in the same breath claims that President Bush (a graduate of Harvard and Yale, by the way) is a mental midget...I'm not so sure that makes good sense. Yes, the man can't give a public speech to save his life; yes, he needs electro-shock therapy every time he says "nookyoolar;" and yes, his inability to master simple phrases (or his frequent malapropisms) make me wonder why Tony Snow doesn't sit him down and say, "Mr. President, you be the Decider; I'll be the Speechifyer." None of this means he's unintelligent--just that he shouldn't be allowed to speak in public. I mean, maybe I'm biased but I consider myself to be fairly intelligent, yet in four years of college, I was hard pressed to actually finish a sentence (right, Jeff?).
The president does have faults. He has horrible judgment in his advisers--I mean Gonzales, Miers, every treasury secretary except the current one, Rumsfeld, etc.--and his loyalty to them blinds him to their fatal flaws (I do respect his loyalty--I just feel like the good of the country must come first). The few good advisers he has (or had, rather--Scooter Libby, Colin Powell [of whom I'm not a huge fan, but he spoke his mind], and to some degree Secretary Chertoff) carry far too little weight in his administration and are not properly defended when victimized (seriously, already--pardon Scooter Libby).
The president's domestic policies are horrendous. No Child Left Behind? The now-dead amnesty bill? Increasing welfare and entitlement programs, but slowing their growth so as to be able to claim he's cut them? There's a litmus test for good ideas in public policy: if Ted Kennedy agrees with you, you're making the wrong choice. I'm so serious about this one that had Kennedy said during the Cold War that America was going to win, I'd bet everything on the USSR.
All of this is to say that while I am not the biggest fan of the president and his administration, he is still the president. He deserves the respect afforded him by his office. He WAS elected--twice. This isn't Great Britain, and we don't have a parliament. We aren't afforded the luxury to remove presidents we simply no longer like. Yes, I have my disagreements with his policies--I mean, the man governs like a liberal. He has, though, managed to keep this country safe for five and a half years. In my opinion, that's got to count for something.
I've written before about how amused I am that eHarmony rejects people. Since I was bored the other night in the hotel room, I thought I'd try my hand at being one of the rejects. I filled out Bob Rohm--er...Neil Clark Warren's personality profile and imagine my despair when they'd actually managed to find about twenty-five or so matches for me in the last two days or so (the first seven came within seconds of completing the profile). So that's kind of a bummer; I think it would have been hilarious to be rejected. (No, I will not be communicating with any of my matches, for several reasons--not the least of which is that they want something like $60 for one month--that's like twice my cell phone bill).
I'll be here in Virginia for another two weeks. On the plus side, my hotel is right beside a big Philip Morris plant. Anybody want me to bring them some cigarettes?
Tuesday, 10 July 2007
-
Gotta brag on Apple real quick before bed: At the startup here at VCU-MCV in Richmond, we're using laptops to inventory hospital equipment--IBM ThinkPad laptops. Aside from lousy battery life (2 hours?!), these machines feel cheap and fragile. I feel like if I type more than forty words per minute they might melt or something.
My MBP on the other hand is solid, elegant, functional, and just downright sexy (for a computer).
IBM v. Apple? It's like the difference between a Kia (or better, a Yugo) and a BMW.
This reminds me (in a very stream-of-consciousness way) about my theory of why the Bush-McKennedy amnesty-for-illegal-invaders bill failed. If you think about the consumer products you love to use (for example, the ubiquitous iPod), what do they have in common? They're simple, elegant, and easy to understand and use. None of these things applies to the defeated (thank God) bill (or Congress as a whole, for that matter). Maybe that's why their approval ratings are at 19%.
Here's my plan for illegal immigration (and Congress in general):
1. Seal the border. "But a fence sends the wrong message to Mexico..." What message is that, exactly? "Stay out?" or "Come in through the gate?" I'm not hearing anything I disagree with.
[1a. Failing that, annex Mexico and seal their southern border. We should be able to do that with the same amount of border enforcement we have now, and I'm sure we can better leverage Mexico's oil production to pay for the social programs and whatnot].
2. Astronomically high fines for anyone caught employing illegal immigrants--fines on the order of $10M per instance. If companies are that hard up for illegal workers, they can pay for insurance and schooling so the taxpayers don't have to. "But, that'll put the produce farmers out of business..." I don't eat vegetables (aha! Finally a principled reason to eat marshmallows and spray cheese!!) so I don't care.
3. Move phone-based tech support jobs from India to Mexico. Half of us already speak Spanish because the illegal immigrants wouldn't learn English. I say that half of us understanding a Mexican support operator is better than none of us understanding an Indian named "Roger." Also, that will provide good paying jobs in Mexico (y'know, other than drug mule) and remove an incentive to be in this country.
4. Offer citizenship only to illegal immigrants who serve for four years in the US military and denounce allegiance to their country of origin. While we're at it, remove "birthright" citizenship. If you're born in this country to a citizen, you're a citizen at birth; if you're born in this country to an illegal, you're not.
As for Congress:
1. Stop passing non-binding resolutions. We elected you to get things done. If you don't have the stones to stand up for your convictions, then don't bother--or just stay out of Washington already.
2. Naming something after yourself should be an offense punishable by removal from office. (I drove through West Virginia on Sunday, and everything was the "Robert C. Byrd something or other." Soon, it won't be West Virginia anymore--it'll be the "Robert C. Byrd Memorial State.)
3. Laws and projects should be voted upon independently. No more using another bill--especially an omnibus budget bill--to slide in $200M bridges to nowhere that will only benefit 50 people and put a ferry business out of business, Senator Stevens of Alaska.
3a. As a consequence, most bills should be no more than three or four pages long. They should also be written in plain English so that citizens--yes, even congressmen--can understand them. Thus ending the practice of voting on a bill you've never read.
4. Filibusters in the Senate will return to actual filibusters rather than filing paperwork. If you really want to block a bill, take the floor and read the phone book.
5. Call in regular citizens (like jury duty) to approve or vet special spending projects (pork). If you can convince twelve normal people that your district needs $30M to fund a study for other uses for wood, you can have it. If they laugh at you, you lose (and should probably have to wear a sign saying "I waste taxpayer dollars").
6. Any member under investigation will be prohibited from voting or serving on committees until cleared in the investigation. The governor of their state (or the state legislature) may appoint a proxy to serve in the interim.
7. Strict term limits--two full six-year terms in the Senate (no more than sixteen years if a senator was elected in a special election), and four full two-year terms in the House (no more than nine years if a congressman was elected in a special election).
8. Committee chairs should be qualified to run their committee. The chair of the house intelligence committee didn't know that al-Qaeda was a Sunni organization and didn't know the difference between Sunni and Shia. Gee, ya think he should hold that job (especially when Rep. Jane Harman, who though a Democrat, is qualified to answer those questions and would be a better fit for the chair).
9. Lobbyists will be prohibited from lobbying their family members or close friends who are members. Members will not be permitted to secure lobbying jobs for these people--nor will they be able to lobby for twelve years before or after their terms.
I'm sure there's more, but it's late and I'm tired.
- browse entries:
- older »


